<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySchool is better than your school</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enzerink.net/peter/blog/2010/02/01/myschool-is-better-than-your-school/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enzerink.net/peter/blog/2010/02/01/myschool-is-better-than-your-school</link>
	<description>Welcome to the entry point for my presence on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 03:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Enzerink</title>
		<link>http://enzerink.net/peter/blog/2010/02/01/myschool-is-better-than-your-school/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Enzerink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The press did a fine job in pumping up the hyperbole with extreme examples whilst totally ignoring the fact that schools develop reputations, good or bad, and parents already make decisions on incomplete information.

I picked on a couple of the more subtle issues rather than the ignorant sledging by the press. I should perhaps have noted that.

There is a flaw of logic in using a data from a league table to support one argument then flagging league tables as a major issue in a &quot;deeply flawed&quot; launch of MySchool. The contradiction is rather distracting amongst a number of valid points.

Now the information is liberated, the analysis and presentation can be refined and further issues identified and prioritised. It&#039;s use in the public system will promote a positive shift and private schools have an opportunity to invest further to create opportunities for better learning outcomes (although not necessarily exceeding the best public schools).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The press did a fine job in pumping up the hyperbole with extreme examples whilst totally ignoring the fact that schools develop reputations, good or bad, and parents already make decisions on incomplete information.</p>
<p>I picked on a couple of the more subtle issues rather than the ignorant sledging by the press. I should perhaps have noted that.</p>
<p>There is a flaw of logic in using a data from a league table to support one argument then flagging league tables as a major issue in a &#8220;deeply flawed&#8221; launch of MySchool. The contradiction is rather distracting amongst a number of valid points.</p>
<p>Now the information is liberated, the analysis and presentation can be refined and further issues identified and prioritised. It&#8217;s use in the public system will promote a positive shift and private schools have an opportunity to invest further to create opportunities for better learning outcomes (although not necessarily exceeding the best public schools).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy Moore</title>
		<link>http://enzerink.net/peter/blog/2010/02/01/myschool-is-better-than-your-school/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Peter,

You have linked to my post re: MySchool as an example of &#039;heavy sledging&#039; and lacking in &#039;coherent argument&#039;. I am pretty certain this is not an accurate or fair analysis of my posts on this vexed issue. 
However, we would probably agree that having data, as a parent, is a good thing. 

I understand the point about PISA and Finland that you make but there is more to this serious picture here than just a chuckle about irony. The Fins have a truly comprehensive system that is producing highly literate people, regardless of socio-economic background whereas the gains that politicians hoped to make in the US and UK, with this &#039;name and shame&#039; approach has failed and very significantly, resulted in worse schoolining outcomes.

Do you really believe that the socio-economic injustice evident in the data ie. the staff student ratio will be addressed by the government? I hope so but would be surprised if it is.

All I would ask, is that you have another read of both my posts and do me the courtesy of making a fairer analysis of what is a major issue of national importance for our entire system education and society. Even better, drop me a line down the track when the politics have played out and see if better educational outcomes are a result. I hope you are right and there has been great improvements. Unfortunately, all the data from our most like educational neighbours, the US and GB, suggest we will regret this reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>You have linked to my post re: MySchool as an example of &#8216;heavy sledging&#8217; and lacking in &#8216;coherent argument&#8217;. I am pretty certain this is not an accurate or fair analysis of my posts on this vexed issue.<br />
However, we would probably agree that having data, as a parent, is a good thing. </p>
<p>I understand the point about PISA and Finland that you make but there is more to this serious picture here than just a chuckle about irony. The Fins have a truly comprehensive system that is producing highly literate people, regardless of socio-economic background whereas the gains that politicians hoped to make in the US and UK, with this &#8216;name and shame&#8217; approach has failed and very significantly, resulted in worse schoolining outcomes.</p>
<p>Do you really believe that the socio-economic injustice evident in the data ie. the staff student ratio will be addressed by the government? I hope so but would be surprised if it is.</p>
<p>All I would ask, is that you have another read of both my posts and do me the courtesy of making a fairer analysis of what is a major issue of national importance for our entire system education and society. Even better, drop me a line down the track when the politics have played out and see if better educational outcomes are a result. I hope you are right and there has been great improvements. Unfortunately, all the data from our most like educational neighbours, the US and GB, suggest we will regret this reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
